Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mitch Barrie's avatar

You seem to think there is a known, tried and tested path to recovery for these addicts. I watched a documentary a few months ago that examined a number of anti-addiction programs in correctional departments in several different states (which typically depended upon the use of methadone and Suboxone), which made the same case. It was an encouraging film, and I wanted to believe, but I suspected it could be propaganda.

You and the filmmakers are making the case that this doesn't have to be something big and nebulous like homelessness. We can't begin to tackle homelessness because so many people are homeless for so many different reasons; which means the One Size Fits All approach preferred by bureaucrats (especially, in recent years, public health bureaucrats) will never ever work.

But if we know what does work in treating addiction, it's really criminal how, for example, California is spending billions on a jobs program for politically connected contractors (a train that runs from, what, Bakersfield to Salinas or something?) when this is something they could do right now, if only someone, anyone, had the will. They obviously have the money.

I have long been opposed to the criminalization of drugs, but as I watched the documentary I realized, the only way these men (it was all men in the doc, and oddly all the programs were run and staffed by women) were ever going to get help was through the penal code and the correctional system; that if drugs weren't illegal and they'd never been arrested, they would have no hope at all. All the men interviewed were (in some cases tearfully) grateful for the existence of the anti-addiction programs and the care of the staff. Most of them were interviewed while still serving their jail sentences and they could be oddly cheerful subjects, since they knew that when they did get out they would have new chances at life they would not otherwise have had. That is, arrest and incarceration saved their lives and they knew it.

I've known since I was about 30 that ideological purity is a sign of an empty head, and here was another hit to my big L Libertarian sensibilities.

BTW, serious question, can psychosis be reversed?

Lillia Gajewski's avatar

If you can step back from the horror long enough, this is an interesting political problem that exemplifies the dysfunction of our current system where "winning" is all that matters, not actually serving. Both parties have an interest in letting this situation continue as it is, sadly enough. But the Cal-Psych idea is actually wonderful. I don't know realistically how many people it will help (I think it may underestimate the tenacity of addiction and the knotty problem of addiction combined with mental illness and how much a fight that is for individuals and may require lifelong monitoring), but it's a lot better than what we're doing now, which is nothing or prison.

Thank you for another great article.

9 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?